Sunday, January 1, 2012
Ramblings From the South: Day 6
Ramblings From the South: Day 5
Friday, December 30, 2011
Ramblings From the South: Day 4
Thursday, December 29, 2011
Ramblings From the South: Day 3
Wednesday, December 28, 2011
Ramblings From the South: Day 2
Ramblings From the South: Day 1
Wednesday, October 20, 2010
The Truth About Lying
“The will of the spirit is to fulfill its own concept.”
This statement alone, said by German philosopher GWF Hegel, is reason to believe that man has some sort of innate standard, perhaps even imposed divinely, that he holds himself to and strives to achieve. Upon each of our daily, hourly, minutely, and even secondly decisions that we make, we are making steps towards – or away from – our “own concept” of what we wish to be. This self-awareness of our potential seems almost inborn and we undoubtedly are heralded in the obvious and unquestionable progressions of meeting it. Inversely, we are chastised and reprimanded by the masses in our blatant attempts to ignore it. So when we ourselves choose to ignore that we are ignoring it, where does that put us?
It brings forth the lie.
In a less comical explanation than Ricky Gervais gave, the lie is the root of wanting something that you do not deserve yet believe you should, especially as it pertains to Hegel’s quotation. When one lies, one is actively seeking to present his or herself in a manner that is inauthentic and removed from reality. By definition, this practice not only suggests that the individual is perceptive of the truth, but also aware enough to reject it.
Other than gaining an escape from a more than likely inconvenient and undesirable situation, one loses so much more. Unfortunately, these losses cannot be measured in a tangible manner that displays the damages to the pretender. Therefore, two possible outcomes ensue. The first being the aforementioned escape as well as the false notion that the ends justified the means in this scenario. The other result, which is not entirely separate but feasible, is a state of denial and the self-manipulation of what actually happened.
This contradiction of the lie and the truth proves that an individual acknowledges an embedded “concept” that it seeks to “fulfill”, otherwise why else do it? To be mistaken about a state of affairs is to be erroneous, but to consciously pay no heed to fact for fear of subsequent consequences to the point where one cannot even bring himself to accept what he knows he must clearly understand is definitively weak. The strength to salute the truth in spite of one’s own wrongdoing requires an appreciation for the moral criterion that one is capable of meeting.
Accordingly, each lie builds upon itself as the denunciation of the original concept begins to ultimately make it hollow. By continually convincing yourself that these principles are really being met through deceit, both to others and to yourself, then you lose what it is that guides you; a lighthouse’s beacon can only be seen from so far away. A harbor provides a safe place to dock a ship regardless of the tumultuous climate, but if a captain refuses to use any other navigation as guidance to get back to shore as it sails away then the ship drifts limply and with little purpose.
It is easier to believe that we are fulfilling our “own concept” rather than actually doing so. Since Hegel dissertated on this idea of a “spirit”, translators have struggled to appropriately render the German word into a suitable English equivalent. While “spirit” is still generally understood, another viable paraphrase would be “inner determination”. Stimulated and encouraged to amount to its highest capacity, the “spirit” will do so if the body that it inhabits is willing to follow its lead. Otherwise, on the surface, the body only deceives itself with each impending lie while the “spirit” remorsefully knows a truth that it cannot act upon, leaving a “concept” unfulfilled.